Iain McMullen

This is a critical feature for us and any clients that have WAN failover.In the past we handled this through OVPN Client Server Site-to-Site, where we could have multiple clients connected to one V...

• View comment
• June 11, 2026 20:27
• 4 votes

+1 from my side, although we typically use Duo for MFA and that would be preferred.

• View comment
• February 20, 2026 19:07
• 1 vote

Update: There is now a method to “Ignore” and essentially acknowledge breach notifications, however once acknowledged there is no way to access or review the notifications.I would suggest that this...

• View comment
• June 17, 2026 13:57
• 0 votes

Hey Terry,It looks like my request for Duo MFA has been put on the “Planned” roadmaphttps://support.timusnetworks.com/hc/en-us/community/posts/49005588272915-Duo-Push-MFA

• View comment
• June 05, 2026 14:00
• 0 votes

Tan Zee - Here is a link to the RMM deployment that includes the Deployment Tokenshttps://support.timusnetworks.com/hc/en-us/articles/46605587685011-Timus-Connect-Massive-Windows-Deployment-via-RMM...

• View comment
• June 01, 2026 17:35
• 0 votes

+1 from our side.

• View comment
• May 21, 2026 14:06
• 0 votes

100% Yes!Critical feature required!

• View comment
• February 20, 2026 21:11
• 0 votes

100% agree!When someone submits a disconnection request that disconnection should be effective for a certain time period. e.g. 1h, 4h, 24h and then after that period ends, the client should be forc...

• View comment
• February 20, 2026 19:19
• 0 votes

We just ran into this issue and workaround. I agree this should be a bit more streamlined.We would also love to have the ability to import a CSV or make bulk changes to the split tunnelling.

• View comment
• February 20, 2026 19:17
• 1 vote

+1 from our side

• View comment
• February 10, 2026 18:36
• 0 votes